CUSTOMER CASE

2026

Frode Laursen

Solar systems passed the test – now scaling to 150 vehicles

Frode Laursen tested solar for 7 months, eliminated battery breakdowns and improved fuel economy — and is now expanding across its fleet.

About Frode Laursen

Frode Laursen is one of the largest transport companies in the Nordics, with 700 trucks and 1,750 trailers – and a clear strategy for service, operational efficiency and sustainability. Since 2020, scope 1+2 emissions have been reduced by 45%, and they reached their 2030 climate targets as early as 2025. The share of our own transports running on alternative fuels has grown from 39% in 2024 to 45% in 2025, alongside investments in longer, more efficient vehicle combinations. To drive further progress in efficiency and sustainability, Frode looked to innovate with solar on diesel vehicles.

CASE INFO

Frode Laursen

VEHICLE TYPE

Trucks and trailers

FLEET SIZE

700 trucks, 1,750 trailers

VEHICLE WITH SOLAR

52 in test phase, 150 in first phase rollout

SOLAR SYSTEM

120 Wp – 360 Wp

52

Solar systems tested

7 months

Testing period

150

Vehicles in phase one rollout

0

Battery breakdowns since fitting solar

The Challenge

Electric trucks are entering the fleet as the technology and infrastructure mature. In the meantime, Frode Laursen was looking for solutions to improve efficiency and sustainability wherever possible. Every new technology has to earn its place, so any solar investment needed to prove itself first.

The Solution

Frode Laursen tested 52 solar systems from Green Energy on trucks and trailers over 7 months, with system sizes ranging from 120 Wp to 360 Wp. The goals were clear: less vehicle downtime, longer battery life, better fuel economy and lower CO2 emissions.

Scaling Up

The results held up. Frode Laursen eliminated battery breakdowns and improved fuel economy, earning solar a place in both its operational and sustainability strategy. The next 100 systems are already on their way, taking the fleet to 150 solar-equipped vehicles in the first phase.

TESTIMONIAL

“We look at every option that can cut costs, improve operations and reduce CO2 emissions. Solar was one of the technologies we tested. The test gave us what we needed – we eliminated battery breakdowns and improved fuel economy – so we are now expanding to 150 vehicles in the first phase. The results have earned solar a place in both our operational and sustainability strategy.”

Jan Skov Pedersen

Technical Director, Frode Laursen

More customer cases

Search

Shortcuts

Menu

Language

Search

Search

LinkedIn

Pilot programme

Find out more about our pilot programme


Download our app

Monitor your solar panel solution

Our app gives you a complete overview of your solar panel solution and how it performs. Insights include total energy production, fuel savings, carbon emission savings etc.

Graphs

Explore more of the benefits of CIGS Solar Panels

The CIGS solar panel is often recognised on its slim profile, its flexibility and its low weight. CIGS solar panels are better than conventional solar panels in almost every aspect, when it comes to sustainability efforts and especially durability.

Liters of water dissipation / kWh produced

Lower is better

Data from: https://unece.org/sed/documents/2021/10/reports/life-cycle-assessment-electricity-generation-options (page 37-38)

Document

CIGS compared to poly-Si

Roof mounted

Land use / kWh produced

Lower is better

Data from: https://unece.org/sed/documents/2021/10/reports/life-cycle-assessment-electricity-generation-options (page 37-38)

Document

CIGS compared to poly-Si

Roof mounted

Ionising radiation emited / kWh produced

Lower is better

Data from: https://unece.org/sed/documents/2021/10/reports/life-cycle-assessment-electricity-generation-options (page 37-38)

Document

CIGS compared to poly-Si

Roof mounted

Carcinogenic effects / kWh produced

Lower is better

Data from: https://unece.org/sed/documents/2021/10/reports/life-cycle-assessment-electricity-generation-options (page 37-38)

Document

CIGS compared to poly-Si

Roof mounted

Freshwater eutrophication / kWh produced

Lower is better

Data from: https://unece.org/sed/documents/2021/10/reports/life-cycle-assessment-electricity-generation-options (page 37-38)

Document

CIGS compared to poly-Si

Roof mounted